{"id":"W2224136207","doi":"10.1016/j.jcde.2015.12.001","title":"Cutter-workpiece engagement determination for general milling using triangle mesh modeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Design and Engineering","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Machining; Milling cutter; Process (computing); Intersection (aeronautics); Tool path; Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Polygon mesh; Engineering drawing; Path (computing); Series (stratigraphy); Cutter location; Geometry; Boundary (topology); Structural engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005907045,0.0005628011,0.000641032,0.0007397559,0.0002768093,0.0007852229,0.0009503953,0.000770106,0.002616982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001739314,0.0002432561,0.0007100489,0.0005574477,0.0003376089,0.0006298468,0.0007520209,0.000506416,0.0003406016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004872555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005931539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004013731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003203692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995813,0.00008784267,0.00002858685,0.00006502326,0.0001988672,0.00003834562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992517,0.000409148,0.00006751891,0.00009702087,0.000151853,0.00002272831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009846537,0.00007250909,0.002485191,0.0001802542,0.00002240012,0.0002129415,0.0001261649,0.9056173,0.01543669,0.009543045,0.0005286356,0.06567644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002238079,0.000009428021,0.0001231675,0.000003042832,0.000001763829,0.00001277172,0.000008767549,0.9975224,0.001271505,0.000701545,0.0003409989,0.000002458984],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04835505,0.00007386277,0.9467579,0.00003284663,0.00001351487,0.00005851988,0.00008118601,0.0003202416,0.00430701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979287,0.0001123008,0.2995572,0.00001720454,0.000007800504,0.00009895406,0.0002735818,0.0001626398,0.001841427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004013731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008754671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06579461531457148,"score_gpt":0.2805356526886614,"score_spread":0.2147410373740899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}