{"id":"W2225671178","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v2i1.12","title":"An Objective Way to Evaluate Continuity of Care in Residency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"College of Family Physicians of Canada; Canadian Medical Association; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Family medicine; Psychological intervention; Primary care; Medicine; Construct (python library); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01640726,0.0005814097,0.0006189316,0.008423282,0.0009190763,0.001698487,0.0008631574,0.0006473261,0.003855814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05216863,0.0002644437,0.000947982,0.005676019,0.0006288445,0.002155813,0.001787565,0.0007448724,0.0004074375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002916174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842882,0.006525463,0.002549798,0.0007460323,0.005207184,0.0006832867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478951,0.02020079,0.01329359,0.002061742,0.01473944,0.001809289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007285846,0.000472128,0.8432252,0.0005711635,0.0002968349,0.00008038025,0.002253759,0.001012064,0.0005819612,0.001113292,0.006025364,0.1436393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001057416,0.001473942,0.977188,0.000308384,0.0001067154,0.0002559923,0.003506366,0.004869788,0.001381138,0.000452758,0.01027487,0.00007633839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552678,0.002273331,0.06470081,0.001532068,0.0004712557,0.00770874,0.01815822,0.0009627158,0.04892519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895618,0.0006298067,0.09027793,0.000299524,0.0001001474,0.005495049,0.004631007,0.00005547219,0.00289311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01842457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08677095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09306275774774204,"score_gpt":0.4377170357592116,"score_spread":0.3446542780114695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}