{"id":"W2225925184","doi":"","title":"Coping with the 'Security-Development Nexus':: The European Community's Instrument for Stability - Rationale and Potential","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik; European Commission","keywords":"Nexus (standard); European union; Corporate governance; Political science; Coping (psychology); Security policy; Foreign policy; Business; Economic system; Public relations; Economics; Economic policy; Computer security; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002842195,0.0001598714,0.0001547299,0.00002809604,0.003183102,0.0001920017,0.0004710376,0.00003635082,0.00008433838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001794136,0.0001049793,0.00005498421,0.0001076699,0.0009568294,0.0002485354,0.00007822874,0.0003263084,0.00002038517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000133434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003447946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002220736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003086398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977016,0.001237105,0.0002732141,0.0002150337,0.0002504307,0.0003225611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.0004551691,0.0002131057,0.0003358684,0.00009506642,0.0001075299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002869589,0.0007232065,0.1283459,0.00008578955,0.0002497665,0.00001477767,0.3079059,0.00006763524,0.0002943011,0.4847412,0.0608982,0.01638635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001153192,0.0001684194,0.3096761,0.00005327788,0.00003097126,0.0000166622,0.01242871,0.00001532246,0.0002048664,0.002102154,0.6737679,0.0003824353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908569,0.0001861244,0.0003962658,0.01239931,0.0002323724,0.0007358649,0.00003533658,0.00005810199,0.0950997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951628,0.00003989956,0.000272658,0.003400838,0.0002837099,0.00001900361,0.000007901146,0.00001166906,0.0008015029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6128696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02855371067650479,"score_gpt":0.2562955359409467,"score_spread":0.2277418252644419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}