{"id":"W2226470632","doi":"","title":"Application of a Monte Carlo linac model in routine verifications of dose calculations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Linear particle accelerator; Computational physics; Radiation treatment planning; Physics; Photon; Beam (structure); Full width at half maximum; Quality assurance; Nuclear medicine; Medical physics; Computer science; Optics; Radiation therapy; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082074,0.0005567306,0.0007938925,0.0006476282,0.0005141064,0.0009584206,0.001470629,0.001262083,0.003330668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00328217,0.0005236796,0.0006248719,0.0007635502,0.0003435035,0.0005709265,0.0004579799,0.0008219159,0.001029933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001516789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008895697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005014248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992617,0.0002804904,0.00003606062,0.00008772528,0.0002909594,0.00004304308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984936,0.0008341865,0.00008378445,0.0002367586,0.0003208039,0.00003087677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006801983,0.00003674721,0.000628338,0.00005988382,0.00002463583,0.00005345443,0.00005685058,0.9794829,0.004655732,0.002704641,0.0003477263,0.01188106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049387,0.00002657207,0.0002544841,0.00001237034,0.00001076176,0.00004449646,0.00000658352,0.9942058,0.003115637,0.0006417097,0.001657108,0.00001405889],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03853525,0.0003372645,0.9503663,0.00009748036,0.00005936834,0.0002719485,0.0003633296,0.003394439,0.006574578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432824,0.000390357,0.3486828,0.0001163808,0.00002799272,0.0006237769,0.0005144877,0.001019208,0.005342552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008895697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01768786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2205664759551175,"score_gpt":0.5605038000919634,"score_spread":0.3399373241368459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}