{"id":"W2227080081","doi":"10.4271/2005-01-3540","title":"Evaluation of Landmine Clearing Mechanisms: Chain Flails and Mine Hammer","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère de la Défense Nationale; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Clearing; Hammer; Chain (unit); Computer science; Computer security; Engineering; Business; Structural engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055154,0.0005695058,0.0004580024,0.001016318,0.0003408954,0.0004007247,0.0006273038,0.0006497713,0.002372105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001655758,0.0002108123,0.0002795426,0.0003876333,0.0004436581,0.000505104,0.0004187937,0.000207029,0.0002646112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005256745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005347094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004139686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006390176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992794,0.0000738117,0.00005558634,0.00007511413,0.0004042429,0.0001118726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981029,0.0005489376,0.0002666651,0.0002097864,0.0006764134,0.0001952413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004649752,0.001374439,0.03150832,0.0008712945,0.00008700187,0.0007314309,0.0005691861,0.05030902,0.7978681,0.000550024,0.000479074,0.1110024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002904675,0.02784066,0.1006462,0.00006923211,0.0001824754,0.0007849819,0.0008358572,0.1111264,0.7553849,0.000188916,0.002540372,0.0001095284],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957263,0.0001286547,0.002960011,0.000009900878,0.000009833277,0.0001293443,0.00007164413,0.00004236621,0.0009218113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942803,0.000101745,0.004299944,0.000007772667,0.000002642152,0.00002304802,0.00009711828,0.000009912045,0.001177563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004139686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008231163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02124748462091798,"score_gpt":0.2750745399330466,"score_spread":0.2538270553121286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}