{"id":"W2228566254","doi":"10.2166/wp.2011.073","title":"Climate change and water governance: an International Joint Commission case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Policy","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Corporate governance; Sustainable management; Natural resource; Environmental resource management; Business; Climate change; Joint (building); Natural resource management; Environmental planning; Water resources; Legitimacy; Sustainable development; Sustainability; Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005576855,0.0001351213,0.0001251806,0.0001033163,0.0005312914,0.0001845916,0.0002565266,0.00004512939,0.0005021634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004414678,0.00008393023,0.00003225678,0.00004792818,0.0001578328,0.0005169486,0.000257667,0.00008743592,0.0001079962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009197972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008014249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09015638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005577543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985637,0.000184674,0.0001886392,0.0002735721,0.0002990136,0.0004903737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995226,0.000002689033,0.00002776127,0.0002346277,0.00003109833,0.00018117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004127496,0.0004764458,0.03906959,0.00001836336,0.00003796174,0.001027539,0.9366202,3.990548e-7,0.0002321126,0.005245004,0.00005974657,0.01717138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003806088,0.001097388,0.1977797,0.00007918191,0.0001265514,0.0003728542,0.09504981,0.00008588966,0.00784348,0.003440735,0.6890866,0.001231718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966773,0.000005002943,0.000004340644,0.002801144,0.0002078024,0.0005001289,0.00001226424,0.00009549005,0.02960078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978768,0.00003933951,0.00007023626,0.0003538338,0.0005535341,0.00005364994,0.000006513143,0.00001876326,0.001027342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9159024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1233283517595116,"score_gpt":0.3379276036606833,"score_spread":0.2145992519011717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}