{"id":"W2231067827","doi":"10.5558/tfc2012-029","title":"Monitoring riparian restoration to ensure recruitment of large woody debris in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Riparian zone; Coarse woody debris; Debris; Snag; Wildlife; Environmental science; Restoration ecology; Riparian forest; Large woody debris; Basal area; Forestry; Sampling (signal processing); Transect; Stream restoration; Habitat; Geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geology; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005107727,0.0002845063,0.000224433,0.001009412,0.001655014,0.001154295,0.001131638,0.0002458062,0.00118572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001132503,0.0002622058,0.0001013085,0.001341536,0.0005229097,0.0002748606,0.0006742146,0.0005165742,0.0002924332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00764751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01067878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9337019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00005532104,0.00002232424,0.0001003536,0.0002863671,0.0001404153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981364,0.000139831,0.0002272817,0.0000658514,0.001033074,0.0003975985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001262114,0.0002168124,0.8948489,0.0001347258,0.00005427242,0.0004966702,0.002682655,0.001280804,0.01102421,0.0001526832,0.002659836,0.0863223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000601834,0.00004734716,0.9947414,0.00002914141,0.0000121541,0.00004442398,0.001308395,0.0008705748,0.0006463698,0.0000159129,0.002267914,0.00001030037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912622,0.0002586797,0.00064031,0.0001010959,0.000005822415,0.0002198433,0.0006319358,0.00006381845,0.006816442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895023,0.0003807022,0.003801408,0.0001046189,0.000003072753,0.0001624204,0.000962649,0.00001430383,0.005068433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06629807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.133377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04397591175777203,"score_gpt":0.2521125284518163,"score_spread":0.2081366166940443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}