{"id":"W2231620613","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, American and Canadian Confrontation and Hearsay Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Common law; Political science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0330979,0.0009026066,0.00139024,0.006010138,0.02259123,0.02131084,0.009053013,0.02055686,0.004153531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05435228,0.0007864591,0.001606189,0.005381759,0.1052404,0.01299882,0.007662766,0.0264424,0.0006393474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07602214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1671352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7820356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9578081,0.009526783,0.001328252,0.003416518,0.02378222,0.004138081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969638,0.01354736,0.001060719,0.001565413,0.01282046,0.00136805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004080596,0.000003906519,0.00007212282,0.00003072437,0.000002565288,0.00004499587,0.001924101,0.0001123152,0.00002727009,0.9898192,0.004226108,0.003732643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003833899,0.00001834691,0.00076134,0.0005566692,0.0000333652,0.0001207889,0.004386326,0.001498456,0.0002374304,0.8171556,0.175106,0.00008736984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008918143,0.0138573,0.04307331,0.6527165,0.002573515,0.0001395023,0.0001404983,0.0001914664,0.2783898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614187,0.009570012,0.04511162,0.1341199,0.003068847,0.0003823594,0.0001347925,0.0002208358,0.04597289],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2179644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5515819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.012052283138683,"score_gpt":0.323288714775776,"score_spread":0.311236431637093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}