{"id":"W2231640728","doi":"10.4103/2320-0057.135407","title":"A bibliometric analysis of a national Journal: The case of the Turkish Journal of Psychology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scientometric Research","topic":"Families in Therapy and Culture","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turkish; Impact factor; Social science; Publishing; Citation; Psychology; Library science; Science Citation Index; Multidisciplinary approach; Web of science; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02662824,0.000151382,0.0006881504,0.2329053,0.0003651261,0.0002030975,0.002901582,0.0002084264,0.003267265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007760241,0.00007131619,0.0009989975,0.5180313,0.001280994,0.0004466071,0.0001903032,0.002161794,0.00001394666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000187918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004797851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009034755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007962477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910228,0.001979622,0.001935135,0.000184079,0.004337314,0.0005410556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786206,0.002823159,0.002806856,0.0005454422,0.01493745,0.0002665037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001011208,0.003710577,0.1214253,0.00007333023,0.01319952,0.0009473486,0.01505283,0.001192768,0.01562858,0.002220867,0.612249,0.2132888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003604543,0.002802061,0.9238925,0.0001086029,0.0006694091,0.02795194,0.0151168,0.0002205685,0.0006895011,0.006668666,0.01807627,0.0001991475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805955,0.0106563,0.0001663556,0.002018973,0.001715313,0.0001930656,0.00001431959,0.000001336559,0.004638812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969828,0.001251846,0.0002834876,0.000200797,0.0003811683,0.000003090361,2.379254e-7,0.000012464,0.0008841221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1963989133507661,"score_gpt":0.5319963834047735,"score_spread":0.3355974700540074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}