{"id":"W2231714004","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0128501","title":"Effect of Coffee Consumption on the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Coffee research and impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Hazard ratio; Subgroup analysis; Prospective cohort study; Cohort study; Cancer; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Cochrane Library; Publication bias; Relative risk; Observational study; Oncology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01957135,0.003228554,0.01694869,0.009266972,0.0007904732,0.003165943,0.002345383,0.001962987,0.002089859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0392338,0.00187911,0.04273755,0.009288974,0.0007665736,0.00150339,0.001642893,0.00184929,0.0001771033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002670114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004424402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006968542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01510385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873908,0.006252799,0.003538584,0.001209707,0.001262944,0.0003450163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724315,0.02056107,0.003956845,0.0008359,0.001909881,0.0003049417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001708618,0.0000308384,0.008264723,0.3017836,0.6747826,0.0001680087,0.0001009756,0.0006315607,0.0002351627,0.000107142,0.0004900655,0.01169671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236827,0.0001435687,0.004832382,0.01772353,0.9755382,0.0001067103,0.00003642379,0.0001513288,0.0001028491,0.0001292065,0.0009785588,0.00002042741],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041349,0.9946929,0.0004007534,0.0001363494,0.00009062102,0.0001556794,0.0002760201,0.00001382184,0.00009899402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1159581,0.8791637,0.002481984,0.0005151479,0.0002212161,0.0007818014,0.0007119493,0.00002359949,0.0001425133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01957135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1035044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3108052126040866,"score_gpt":0.4476074677575771,"score_spread":0.1368022551534905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}