{"id":"W2231730559","doi":"","title":"Unsustainable Development in Canada: Environmental Assessment, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Environmental Justice in the Tar Sands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Environmental impact assessment; Cost–benefit analysis; Sustainable development; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Greenhouse gas; Business; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Geography; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001776789,0.0003200656,0.0003148854,0.0001336818,0.0004713837,0.00007874767,0.0005230225,0.0001036748,0.0007300497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001117348,0.0002597223,0.0000751133,0.000399207,0.0001880996,0.0004088694,0.000224025,0.002484995,0.00001665478],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01173879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000928321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2075406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9423969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958709,0.0001478172,0.0005096206,0.0004111572,0.000827075,0.002233381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992864,0.00008723338,0.0001949349,0.0002417197,0.000001140771,0.0001886158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001818243,0.0002507172,0.9868446,0.000002563132,0.0001077433,0.00004228818,0.0007067657,0.0005459805,0.002210633,0.0004742678,0.00002455418,0.008771714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000915669,0.00006770732,0.9742973,0.000003176958,0.000155099,0.0001065637,0.01903077,0.0004287109,0.00009564126,0.002083226,0.002485519,0.0003306528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786,0.0001640755,0.0001850782,0.0002892796,0.00008827353,0.0003657555,0.00001322404,0.000004616515,0.001029707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977155,0.00104234,0.0002078253,0.000354276,0.00005110115,0.00003953257,0.00004741715,0.00002208837,0.0005199513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7348562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003487640580840418,"score_gpt":0.2254344781354928,"score_spread":0.2219468375546524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}