{"id":"W2233951085","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Legal Client’s Best Interests: Lessons from Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Comprehensive Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Best practice; Jurisprudence; Legal ethics; Political science; Economic Justice; Best interests; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038352,0.001012488,0.002263484,0.004432677,0.01851286,0.02475268,0.005829223,0.02175163,0.004044657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03688956,0.001010919,0.001235697,0.002812494,0.169172,0.03864984,0.01751577,0.03215697,0.0008220683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0290031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0331677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02267226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02310667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9722539,0.01786854,0.0007747525,0.001941039,0.004118969,0.003042769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500716,0.04147823,0.001469883,0.001920421,0.002412753,0.002647124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006021195,0.00003817788,0.0001232864,0.0000641545,0.000004431045,0.0001617912,0.01879591,0.0001609079,0.00001556129,0.9713696,0.002342023,0.00691812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001280911,0.00001224611,0.00009805988,0.0003419716,0.000003499827,0.0001202068,0.007724346,0.0002954594,0.0000363636,0.9706658,0.02067639,0.00001282522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02419441,0.08155301,0.04194982,0.5328285,0.001471446,0.0001329962,0.00003029428,0.00008047547,0.3177592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707505,0.03386171,0.01361137,0.06663547,0.002176951,0.0003284846,0.00004244354,0.0001473533,0.01244562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2104332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08505117815841898,"score_gpt":0.3416158143662374,"score_spread":0.2565646362078184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}