{"id":"W2234269269","doi":"","title":"An Obvious ‘Comity of Errors’: Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Admonishes Motives of Applications Judge, While Agreeing with the Result","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Appeal; Notice; Jurisprudence; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Federal court; Supreme court; Business; Jurisdiction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002432048,0.00009910033,0.0002372802,0.00007569705,0.0008004886,0.00003619621,0.0004146333,0.00007813997,0.00001141409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005212006,0.00006839936,0.00006636105,0.0003347044,0.0003717646,0.0003802638,0.00001252208,0.0005420888,0.000001056018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003440229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004757474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3902944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.835711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978021,0.0001881879,0.0003167919,0.0001057577,0.0004075645,0.001179551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988375,0.00006562864,0.000457297,0.000147072,0.0002927158,0.0001997723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002033225,0.0005834131,0.4329292,0.00009454293,0.0005416957,0.000001213869,0.05815196,0.0002411391,0.002204996,0.4918296,0.0006325953,0.01258637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003373869,0.00343138,0.2545478,0.0005480479,0.0005149426,0.0002012768,0.5768648,0.00007285758,0.00605686,0.09789872,0.05495517,0.001534278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977949,0.003005425,0.001118603,0.001817971,0.00008195559,0.0003823008,0.00002006037,0.00001240639,0.01561229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0003003101,0.00003714179,0.00002477527,0.000409638,0.000007717449,0.00000191973,0.00001071255,0.0001560887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5187128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8439555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01254816188868201,"score_gpt":0.2708727186871752,"score_spread":0.2583245567984931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}