{"id":"W2237679042","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.008","title":"Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Cochrane; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University; American Thoracic Society","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Observational study; Systematic review; Quality of evidence; Psychology; Evidence-based medicine; MEDLINE; Quality (philosophy); Baseline (sea); Medicine; Meta-analysis; Actuarial science; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2529697,0.002897636,0.01132634,0.01706857,0.001496921,0.009199964,0.005223234,0.007253357,0.02739139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7519343,0.004285102,0.01994433,0.02147035,0.002751017,0.009466744,0.00429843,0.009804524,0.006188408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007409527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01867936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009081994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02793105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5414112,0.2043805,0.2034942,0.00809764,0.04033678,0.002279775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1292537,0.5779095,0.1209358,0.03626601,0.1320848,0.003550319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002760205,0.0001560267,0.01167434,0.5193315,0.02842081,0.0001191582,0.001309715,0.0007303708,0.001055538,0.003222115,0.2223745,0.2088457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008065551,0.0006445988,0.03048012,0.6582284,0.05541993,0.0003000814,0.0006640539,0.001716165,0.001109574,0.0124695,0.2302706,0.0006315271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0140437,0.4620626,0.08413194,0.1384534,0.03136177,0.08558687,0.1604408,0.003797879,0.02012112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1293988,0.1825216,0.4018759,0.1145567,0.006287091,0.09938756,0.0551678,0.003095493,0.007709042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7470303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9212214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9350509966107277,"score_gpt":0.6535339054625325,"score_spread":0.2815170911481951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}