{"id":"W2238813690","doi":"10.1111/gcb.13184","title":"Ecological and methodological drivers of species’ distribution and phenology responses to climate change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; Sight Research UK; Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Phenology; Ecology; Variation (astronomy); Taxon; Species distribution; Global change; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1911602,0.001183132,0.002287553,0.009974336,0.0009835478,0.004300076,0.002293542,0.001370704,0.002143545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3300542,0.0008923656,0.005997958,0.01540894,0.002332885,0.003445984,0.002798423,0.001392179,0.0003361903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002173077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005480956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006636641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01540619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8332151,0.1085179,0.03605639,0.009725415,0.01101709,0.001468166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4663549,0.4068988,0.06053765,0.04158892,0.02301699,0.001602752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001319869,0.00008770783,0.656401,0.08854829,0.1080569,0.0004837581,0.008100763,0.003030437,0.005087473,0.008619336,0.00319792,0.1170666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520407,0.0004268479,0.8327186,0.02280029,0.07484232,0.0004479339,0.004273144,0.001595856,0.002773504,0.01796805,0.04166463,0.0002366884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3785847,0.4739791,0.09139493,0.01851504,0.002417111,0.002976986,0.01880698,0.0002413345,0.01308388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980613,0.03345607,0.05325038,0.003809403,0.000703393,0.00351312,0.006308982,0.0001769657,0.0007203534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1911602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2448968606274279,"score_gpt":0.3642875966780289,"score_spread":0.119390736050601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}