{"id":"W2241107961","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Ombuds Oversight in the Canadian Access to Information Context: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01747603,0.0005352208,0.0009264678,0.007400653,0.02621024,0.02094653,0.003791971,0.002792787,0.005412403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06314129,0.0006244587,0.0007356843,0.01681349,0.02579642,0.007166194,0.006746955,0.004412272,0.0002621998],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2754475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2543555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783638,0.004840901,0.0006862689,0.00152553,0.009506145,0.005077272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93115,0.03653425,0.006840947,0.001529878,0.02039563,0.003549344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598638,0.0002458064,0.1684869,0.0007067191,0.00008194083,0.0009003479,0.234545,0.002350478,0.0004446415,0.5438137,0.009391567,0.03887306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005635355,0.0001006459,0.1778702,0.001291737,0.0002061026,0.0001361815,0.7296046,0.004043205,0.0003681451,0.02274457,0.06344833,0.000129995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7908314,0.003982276,0.001900625,0.01592126,0.0000669924,0.0005217699,0.0006664597,0.00002186926,0.1860873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934921,0.001592765,0.001160604,0.0007019087,0.00001535609,0.00008808417,0.0001519279,0.00001089033,0.002786406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05448030005603018,"score_gpt":0.3934642480442726,"score_spread":0.3389839479882424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}