{"id":"W2241598605","doi":"10.54648/joia2009008","title":"Principles of Treaty Interpretation in the NAFTA Arbitral Award on <i>Canadian Cattlemen</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Tribunal; Treaty; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Context (archaeology); Convention; Law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Arbitration; Object (grammar); International law; History; Public international law; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01851946,0.000831382,0.0009494736,0.002771676,0.01736473,0.02004996,0.003580189,0.009915513,0.005176844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02323928,0.0009668196,0.001543404,0.003976407,0.02752215,0.005890382,0.004510797,0.01558758,0.0009382868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04791128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07599003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5503033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5929866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9711559,0.006344779,0.001064434,0.001924113,0.01479486,0.004715977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953585,0.001895521,0.0002778958,0.000439849,0.001792315,0.0002358624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001918036,0.000002122724,0.00003423793,0.000005462183,0.000001355048,0.00001488027,0.001046084,0.00009815728,0.00002490884,0.9931955,0.004304701,0.001270577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002421671,0.00001604117,0.0008438227,0.0002566813,0.00002783321,0.00008123214,0.001958654,0.001241906,0.000246598,0.6183873,0.3768201,0.00009563885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01019975,0.004220719,0.03682017,0.04415855,0.002258322,0.0002679335,0.0002640282,0.0001228829,0.9016876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6704908,0.003822305,0.04759158,0.02407979,0.002211906,0.0009100147,0.000451054,0.0003670639,0.2500756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4496967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01797680043149414,"score_gpt":0.2468929614622819,"score_spread":0.2289161610307878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}