{"id":"W2241646490","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: New Directions for Section 15","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Scrutiny; Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; High Court; Prejudice (legal term); Dignity; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02585081,0.0007739143,0.0009804645,0.001969256,0.01073868,0.01580249,0.006455701,0.02927635,0.006886878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03437486,0.0006331846,0.001572422,0.001564471,0.03384536,0.01541094,0.007258141,0.02213334,0.001039067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02141173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0969678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3323048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.445312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9751437,0.006999987,0.0007451752,0.002885561,0.009345527,0.004880186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787689,0.0117274,0.0009430046,0.00152473,0.004291063,0.002744874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001300119,0.00001819447,0.0002426734,0.00003828594,0.000004278857,0.0001336764,0.00188468,0.0001303103,0.000118665,0.957444,0.03247841,0.007493925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008838018,0.00008640716,0.001410253,0.0006019759,0.00003461639,0.0001962999,0.003774623,0.0007987717,0.0003857377,0.5704547,0.421997,0.0001711418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01207277,0.007631257,0.009763435,0.7261226,0.002560658,0.00008915323,0.0001273389,0.000233656,0.2413992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4426099,0.007295838,0.02807735,0.4434127,0.003384345,0.0004078741,0.0002280379,0.0002130732,0.07437083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6607412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01950495585855554,"score_gpt":0.3139800944685601,"score_spread":0.2944751386100045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}