{"id":"W2241646490","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: New Directions for Section 15","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Scrutiny; Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; High Court; Prejudice (legal term); Dignity; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001047555,0.0001037327,0.0001331241,0.00004321593,0.002137831,0.0001068359,0.0001606337,0.00009203827,0.00004066939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003210189,0.00008697818,0.0001604524,0.0002346727,0.00005671156,0.0002964028,0.000007462937,0.0007523859,0.00002059011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001967569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001352875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002031608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03276143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977136,0.00008568114,0.0001705439,0.0001426434,0.0002612787,0.001626307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995064,0.00006723191,0.0001053639,0.00005227717,0.0001403155,0.0001284435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001052138,0.0001561188,0.0007595693,0.000003156094,0.0003167882,0.000001014516,0.01887754,0.00005688701,0.00111603,0.5317126,0.05110228,0.3957928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005615128,0.0002723421,0.002551099,0.000009231358,0.00005437264,0.00002293163,0.01505444,0.000007571998,0.00005088123,0.2346564,0.7465677,0.0001916052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3470396,0.05162344,0.1009019,0.3742943,0.01111363,0.003747112,0.00001323229,0.001471221,0.1097956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923322,0.009406673,0.0004638329,0.0002750941,0.005579059,0.00001039062,0.000001875647,0.00001137866,0.06092968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01950495585855554,"score_gpt":0.3139800944685601,"score_spread":0.2944751386100045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}