{"id":"W2242307981","doi":"10.1002/sim.6818","title":"The missing cause approach to unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Bruyère; University of Ottawa; McGill University; Ottawa Public Health; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confounding; Pharmacoepidemiology; Spurious relationship; Statistics; Observational study; Missing data; Econometrics; Medicine; Instrumental variable; Average treatment effect; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Propensity score matching; Medical prescription","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003351268,0.0001662159,0.0004115151,0.0001610951,0.00006808592,0.000006415013,0.000262189,0.00007031633,0.00003230741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0259328,0.00008845701,0.0000108577,0.0002510189,0.0003294943,0.00004693848,0.0000590014,0.0002625448,0.000006692476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002669638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004742861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005741816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001450183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980557,0.0003495126,0.0006622752,0.0002560696,0.0002453456,0.0004311057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990234,0.009102212,0.0001511025,0.0003181578,0.00008889699,0.0001056234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005569847,0.0000438532,0.00225118,0.00005182066,0.00001490955,0.00003613747,0.0009805382,0.000005607876,0.00978998,0.9317049,0.01710018,0.03796519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008402463,0.00008997253,0.0007938003,0.0004395252,0.00001710852,0.00001233293,0.0003042144,0.0005328417,0.0006782817,0.992992,0.003139749,0.0001599368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002075527,0.0001024348,0.989832,0.003354589,0.000210393,0.000432695,0.00001793552,0.0000765446,0.003897871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3767774,0.000366751,0.6209921,0.0009430795,0.0001999915,0.0001463521,0.000006484426,0.00004835592,0.0005194894],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3747019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2739779879782596,"score_gpt":0.5135117581148383,"score_spread":0.2395337701365787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}