{"id":"W2243757466","doi":"","title":"Of Reasonableness, Fairness and the Public Interest: Judicial Review of Copyright Board Decisions in Canada's Copyright Pentalogy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Dissenting opinion; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Copyright Act; Fair use; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Law; Public interest; Agency (philosophy); Intellectual property; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006505206,0.0002522625,0.0007281963,0.0001385418,0.0001670444,0.0001514773,0.000662224,0.00007466304,0.01127774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009969218,0.0001495502,0.0001120466,0.0006410637,0.0004380203,0.001097237,0.000419107,0.000290303,0.0001521594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003456468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.811696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8852119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979556,0.00008842438,0.0008329148,0.0003457792,0.0003939326,0.0003832999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982392,0.0003530973,0.0003760348,0.0004795408,0.0005021836,0.0000499796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003242984,0.0001976457,0.01117832,0.002586687,0.0001138988,0.0000207937,0.00004622692,7.815423e-7,0.0002614187,0.3077696,0.6667523,0.01074799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003573869,0.00004422998,0.0120157,0.005933123,0.0001595352,0.00001475597,0.0003110099,0.003818718,0.0007100219,0.02756878,0.9451553,0.0006950015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203711,0.04364357,0.0001420438,0.0384528,0.00199232,0.003686923,0.00003476108,0.00008784645,0.1915887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921775,0.002578951,0.00003978633,0.004595593,0.0001941891,0.00007528298,0.00002664208,0.00002485244,0.0002871602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2802009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02123245066840728,"score_gpt":0.2200030845621162,"score_spread":0.1987706338937089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}