{"id":"W2244306463","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.005","title":"Market incompleteness and the equity premium puzzle: Evidence from state-level data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; George Washington University","keywords":"Equity premium puzzle; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Incomplete markets; Consumption (sociology); Equity (law); Humanities; Welfare economics; Financial economics; Risk premium; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Expected utility hypothesis; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006795275,0.0003439891,0.001263733,0.001624859,0.0005198471,0.002462262,0.001343903,0.001894629,0.005838607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05018076,0.0007760101,0.0008659071,0.003473654,0.001298367,0.003008299,0.001380452,0.002099787,0.0007752739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004687374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006447948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01116061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00891885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985261,0.0004509671,0.0002089543,0.0003184605,0.0003417711,0.0001537437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8528598,0.08009528,0.04944212,0.01122367,0.004685238,0.001693932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001354998,0.0004103605,0.9527774,0.0002480546,0.00122986,0.000460204,0.0007510948,0.008951347,0.0007770518,0.01067248,0.006927482,0.01543952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710069,0.0001573568,0.953311,0.000110196,0.0006858243,0.0002920658,0.0005655432,0.01934466,0.0008570614,0.01978404,0.004544844,0.0000764623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888257,0.001324155,0.001435971,0.002004406,0.00002421419,0.00001313192,0.004771315,0.00003767517,0.001563428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946952,0.0005768257,0.0002630563,0.0001080642,0.00007169434,0.000006899082,0.003893718,0.00001478,0.0003696068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01116061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03593725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2088749715001844,"score_gpt":0.3009426130288608,"score_spread":0.09206764152867633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}