{"id":"W2244428322","doi":"","title":"Rural Communities and Landscape Change: A Case Study of Wild Ennerdale","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of rural and community development","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Commission; Argument (complex analysis); Geography; National park; Local community; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Sociology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008049873,0.0001579505,0.0003563911,0.00004077881,0.001113424,0.00003092736,0.0002333416,0.00005352241,0.0000297684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002397318,0.00006432377,0.00004348278,0.0001730533,0.0001482894,0.0002662976,0.0003013696,0.0004486966,3.334449e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002531752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000269157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004009361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003534578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985384,0.0005200221,0.0004934675,0.00003399308,0.0002293596,0.0001847076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990243,0.0003046654,0.0002476925,0.00006799983,0.0002331563,0.0001221615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000132241,0.0009484193,0.6967386,0.00004218438,0.00008699893,0.000189955,0.1472225,3.545311e-7,0.000442042,0.000006906045,0.0001343996,0.1540553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003892051,0.0007443999,0.554338,0.00004360319,0.000009974534,0.002506686,0.4412982,0.00000196867,0.00007691517,0.00005174168,0.0004315549,0.0001078228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987659,0.0005877025,2.645967e-7,0.0003392882,0.00004944358,0.0001956689,0.000002188565,0.000009673251,0.00004986841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992672,0.0004860708,0.00007236453,0.00005468991,0.00003817895,0.000007260467,0.000005241921,9.862082e-7,0.00006805624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2940756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8563672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04705749648362127,"score_gpt":0.2407547381958257,"score_spread":0.1936972417122045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}