{"id":"W2244751102","doi":"10.5558/tfc2012-061","title":"Calculating empirical best linear unbiased predictors (EBLUPs) for nonlinear mixed effects models in Excel/Solver","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Spreadsheets and End-User Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Estimator; Applied mathematics; Taylor series; Nonlinear system; Solver; Conditional expectation; Series (stratigraphy); Calibration; Mathematics; Random effects model; Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01374364,0.002362562,0.001551778,0.00300066,0.000621169,0.002088524,0.002321358,0.001322153,0.0340689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06306513,0.00141787,0.001725897,0.002007822,0.0005497665,0.001763938,0.001857021,0.002707721,0.009383894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005710027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002210325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00252523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00373717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937438,0.004122369,0.0005613428,0.000464349,0.0009744871,0.000133576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468431,0.04877437,0.001497434,0.001276131,0.001465541,0.0001433331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003487319,0.0003056568,0.005218095,0.002089968,0.0007925243,0.0005496261,0.0006916503,0.1603815,0.004233846,0.08774323,0.05867127,0.6789739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002349312,0.0002446311,0.002531505,0.000654916,0.0002870564,0.0004951708,0.0002990237,0.8071482,0.01479991,0.09822256,0.07492515,0.0001568575],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001562639,0.0001149491,0.9870028,0.000082968,0.00003258243,0.0001369361,0.000966765,0.008077128,0.002023186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007102651,0.0001071899,0.9889832,0.00004876557,0.0000153595,0.0006822363,0.0005084248,0.001484831,0.00106739],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0340689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1139719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04690621304569164,"score_gpt":0.301282894898718,"score_spread":0.2543766818530263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}