{"id":"W2245992355","doi":"","title":"Development assistance and forestry: a Canadian perspective.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Forestry Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Forestry; Community forestry; Business; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Geography; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002880609,0.0007179514,0.0006077578,0.005866111,0.00492624,0.008304724,0.001682359,0.003881848,0.01162255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007605016,0.0003264358,0.0004714286,0.01320322,0.003952461,0.003087486,0.001237901,0.003535802,0.0006381281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07057226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1944216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960161,0.0004764068,0.000121402,0.0001970207,0.002020324,0.001168825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944372,0.001014658,0.0002569322,0.0001107844,0.003379061,0.0008013569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004796963,0.00002958346,0.001803277,0.001019567,0.00005713303,0.0001844514,0.000859675,0.0009841467,0.0001541771,0.3485904,0.5462466,0.1000229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001101647,0.000008858002,0.006482758,0.001371538,0.00005215788,0.00006892467,0.001327419,0.0002365778,0.00008112494,0.01371981,0.9766147,0.00002529653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001756283,0.6075335,0.0005609195,0.1738401,0.002372291,0.00002684138,0.0007980581,0.00004317261,0.2130687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1093086,0.7740343,0.001479553,0.03106167,0.001365239,0.00004863486,0.0005355895,0.00004977263,0.08211667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07057226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01599664986351266,"score_gpt":0.2630451243017226,"score_spread":0.2470484744382099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}