{"id":"W2246758411","doi":"10.1123/ijsc.3.4.501","title":"Look Who’s Talking—Athletes on Twitter: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sport Communication","topic":"Sports, Gender, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Social media; Microblogging; League; Pace; Advertising; Sport communication; Psychology; Period (music); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Medicine; Social science; Physical therapy; Communication studies; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003012583,0.0008235261,0.0006336286,0.00206398,0.01501582,0.003145339,0.001914693,0.006563388,0.00444083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00893716,0.0006669582,0.000693393,0.001814475,0.003262893,0.004832656,0.003614842,0.002325792,0.0009690302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002042844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001524489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01171116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02681067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958506,0.002370342,0.0002111112,0.0003992828,0.0005329902,0.0006357407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926103,0.004857296,0.0007708645,0.0002165266,0.000443493,0.001101546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002320872,0.001039549,0.04027728,0.0005603325,0.00004632532,0.1069742,0.8098682,0.000407851,0.003460596,0.004620019,0.006822621,0.02569089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001755381,0.0002805283,0.009145983,0.0002828712,0.00003543784,0.03303216,0.9159623,0.001232134,0.001987754,0.0006415242,0.0373139,0.00006786895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786351,0.0004323346,0.002296947,0.005462916,0.0001355355,0.0002288181,0.0002027288,0.00003705733,0.01256841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764163,0.001352102,0.005498682,0.00152676,0.0001956225,0.0003754222,0.0001654994,0.00005486828,0.01441473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01501582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02328598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03932144123098399,"score_gpt":0.3616521302218187,"score_spread":0.3223306889908347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}