{"id":"W2246879839","doi":"10.1016/j.aim.2016.11.021","title":"Resolution of singularities of the cotangent sheaf of a singular variety","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Advances in Mathematics","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Cotangent bundle; Sheaf; Resolution of singularities; Algebraic variety; Variety (cybernetics); Projective variety; Mathematical analysis; Monomial; Gravitational singularity; Trigonometric functions; Algebraic number; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000964803,0.001611809,0.001106559,0.004563759,0.001931237,0.003922028,0.001405832,0.001404082,0.008199085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002547187,0.0005861701,0.001007657,0.001822705,0.003454284,0.003912422,0.004027532,0.00378717,0.001215708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001488814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004921481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00126102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008762994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.0001458179,0.0000498529,0.0001528343,0.0003295206,0.0001425586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991047,0.0001654597,0.0001646753,0.00007410029,0.0001048703,0.0003861253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001728685,0.00006817765,0.0009996777,0.0001070873,0.00006011816,0.001951264,0.001295865,0.002739473,0.007197237,0.974436,0.001797561,0.009174577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007136136,0.0001161191,0.001507699,0.00004949807,0.00004354351,0.001892463,0.0006314514,0.01177034,0.003301041,0.9731736,0.00738882,0.00005400047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8211628,0.002701608,0.07940295,0.002280799,0.0008263664,0.00006569651,0.000388247,0.0004220798,0.09274945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696385,0.0007303821,0.007697225,0.0001471387,0.0004022409,0.0000156379,0.0002713038,0.0001042071,0.02099345],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008199085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02742869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02468385277194622,"score_gpt":0.301540512587838,"score_spread":0.2768566598158918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}