{"id":"W2246879839","doi":"10.1016/j.aim.2016.11.021","title":"Resolution of singularities of the cotangent sheaf of a singular variety","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Advances in Mathematics","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Cotangent bundle; Sheaf; Resolution of singularities; Algebraic variety; Variety (cybernetics); Projective variety; Mathematical analysis; Monomial; Gravitational singularity; Trigonometric functions; Algebraic number; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001312443,0.0002848045,0.0009699755,0.0001397927,0.00003937903,0.000005718409,0.0007247729,0.000300777,0.00007390702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001849667,0.000192994,0.0003150233,0.0002523893,0.0005624252,0.00009437728,0.0007371611,0.0003465506,9.348645e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007910281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000650317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008845464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973809,0.0001861447,0.001367491,0.0002517891,0.0005814667,0.0002322623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954019,0.001293731,0.001790078,0.001248586,0.0002376347,0.00002802303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005966677,0.0008412236,0.0005474768,0.01848638,0.0001588867,0.000001951382,0.007169521,0.0002910973,0.001404883,0.9692045,0.00004917597,0.001785257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002721786,0.00003536855,0.00008329289,0.005176343,0.0001271091,0.000006038597,0.0008425398,0.0003097139,0.02136711,0.9713877,0.0002135132,0.0001790582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7053393,0.01320148,0.252207,0.000193644,0.001611141,0.001976092,0.0003587482,0.00008063031,0.02503198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891491,0.0005802214,0.1098638,0.000008107499,0.00005411976,0.00002354151,0.000004238301,0.00005142352,0.000265457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1838098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7870069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02468385277194622,"score_gpt":0.301540512587838,"score_spread":0.2768566598158918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}