{"id":"W2248719567","doi":"","title":"Rational Expectation Bubbles: Evidence from Hong Kong’s Sub-Indices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Rational expectations; Economics; Causality (physics); Unit root; Econometrics; Empirical evidence; Financial economics; Stock (firearms); Unit root test; Stock market; Bubble; Test (biology); Economic bubble; Cointegration; Monetary economics; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007796584,0.0001831663,0.0002070732,0.001280456,0.0003602226,0.0009638843,0.0002214742,0.000253761,0.001233025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003060348,0.0001545787,0.0002059004,0.00141115,0.0004762613,0.0009184688,0.0006624458,0.0003629061,0.000170118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008314843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007031029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09353771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0612179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997281,0.00003546746,0.00003516615,0.00003880362,0.00008420199,0.00007811034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936237,0.001135924,0.002794736,0.0003869755,0.001361285,0.0006972884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425046,0.00004169447,0.9899461,0.00003102622,0.00005227106,0.0002589218,0.001303468,0.000293811,0.0003741493,0.0006207786,0.0009933101,0.005941998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004516519,0.00002486299,0.9965698,0.000008656229,0.00002169784,0.00004526685,0.000888226,0.00110049,0.0003224685,0.00009069751,0.0009153208,0.000007971602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973269,0.0001392028,0.0001162221,0.0001042243,0.000004963882,0.000008966058,0.0004549355,0.000004823458,0.001839832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998914,0.00008798795,0.00004134312,0.00001921673,0.000007875527,0.000003791049,0.0005538373,0.000002033368,0.0003699596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09353771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1859865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0407322107047426,"score_gpt":0.2412358413972596,"score_spread":0.200503630692517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}