{"id":"W2249301682","doi":"","title":"Respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: the case of whale conservation in Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Respondent; Willingness to pay; Whale; Subsidy; Sample (material); Phone; Valuation (finance); Payment; Economics; Actuarial science; Geography; Public economics; Business; Political science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0180989,0.0003727338,0.001114991,0.001318883,0.001878258,0.003814188,0.001977344,0.002222383,0.002786468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0758673,0.0004790704,0.0008839908,0.003101383,0.003899845,0.002665901,0.002155283,0.002322249,0.0001150448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008065005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001606103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3679097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2854921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870713,0.009492956,0.0002948543,0.0008531166,0.0007558626,0.001531779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8767768,0.1005567,0.01599247,0.003139782,0.002269477,0.001264752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001247335,0.0004687477,0.7447784,0.0002938465,0.0009460485,0.003847199,0.016546,0.08304407,0.0003809929,0.1000342,0.003206314,0.04520699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002396175,0.0002875678,0.6560749,0.0003989212,0.0005566667,0.001310159,0.03136602,0.2232239,0.0006180277,0.07718019,0.008427887,0.00031622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823633,0.001163164,0.008958562,0.002882352,0.00001591572,0.00006884093,0.000290773,0.00001097999,0.004246065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997929,0.000253071,0.0009732359,0.0001095362,0.00001776567,0.00003437251,0.00008992514,0.00000214853,0.0005909795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6320903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7315365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07249942335483943,"score_gpt":0.2197648907723017,"score_spread":0.1472654674174622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}