{"id":"W2251246349","doi":"","title":"Twofold Optimality of the Relative Utilitarian Bargaining Solution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Bargaining problem; Consistency (knowledge bases); Invariant (physics); Class (philosophy); Sequence (biology); Zero (linguistics); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Combinatorics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590705,0.0004518808,0.001080711,0.0008560891,0.001305627,0.003266959,0.001166688,0.003041802,0.02314915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02215406,0.0005168035,0.0007500655,0.0006857586,0.002404728,0.004588032,0.002138268,0.002943374,0.003271804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001884841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001796526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004827153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004583157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952662,0.002383009,0.0002949483,0.0007135728,0.0007823753,0.0005599933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946268,0.003246299,0.0004353955,0.0005407941,0.0007840591,0.0003666168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005974555,0.0000195281,0.0001137948,0.00002467655,0.000007048106,0.00003855671,0.0001151856,0.005360516,0.0004969738,0.9855509,0.001970153,0.006242895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003794287,0.00003790504,0.0001951941,0.00002560033,0.000007718259,0.00004591202,0.00009388274,0.0300094,0.00056198,0.964576,0.004393137,0.0000153575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1578946,0.0005343112,0.4836429,0.01395352,0.0007561472,0.0002116458,0.0005209056,0.0003739208,0.342112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712011,0.0002507909,0.07141649,0.0007565801,0.0003520613,0.000271015,0.0002620273,0.0002031433,0.05528682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02314915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07744169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08669268012569117,"score_gpt":0.3170559823592533,"score_spread":0.2303633022335621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}