{"id":"W2251590366","doi":"10.2495/wp010091","title":"Evaluation Of Hydraulic Conductivity In A Phragmites WastewaterTreatment Plant","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","topic":"Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phragmites; Permeameter; Hydraulic conductivity; Environmental science; Wetland; Effluent; Evapotranspiration; Aquatic plant; Permeability (electromagnetism); Rhizome; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental engineering; Soil science; Soil water; Macrophyte; Botany; Engineering; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006612954,0.0001433824,0.0001905698,0.00005170086,0.000114079,0.000004620411,0.00007521469,0.00006228699,0.002374802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004096482,0.00009257653,0.00004889168,0.00007048105,0.0005038739,0.00006985155,0.00001235096,0.0001025559,0.00008218423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003076296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008283722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003308155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001091563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987195,0.0003313627,0.0002098414,0.0002624984,0.0002925877,0.0001842191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995457,0.0001169898,0.00006388038,0.0002297108,0.000002164257,0.00004155165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001817446,0.004758708,0.391388,0.00001338912,0.0008100736,0.0000585894,0.006267276,0.3673911,0.006058228,0.0003235278,0.00001730072,0.2210964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02227977,0.001085502,0.911912,0.0000345324,0.001142131,0.000282391,0.0008499057,0.02717966,0.02464233,0.009277863,0.0008580281,0.0004558448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972159,0.00004944413,0.0002493316,0.0007278004,0.00005598064,0.0006251871,0.0000130995,0.000008118033,0.001055119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992521,0.0001772028,0.00009088128,0.00003712654,0.000003123146,0.0002396624,0.000005833048,0.000006776201,0.0001873103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.520524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0130971803578101,"score_gpt":0.2067098873418707,"score_spread":0.1936127069840606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}