{"id":"W2251771966","doi":"","title":"Theoretical Modeling of Bonding Characteristics and Performance of Wood Composites. Part III. Bonding Strength Between Two Wood Elements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wood and Fiber Science (Society of Wood Science and Technology)","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; FPInnovations","keywords":"Composite material; Materials science; Bond strength; Compaction; Ultimate tensile strength; Solid wood; Bonding strength; Adhesive","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149798,0.0002258246,0.0004248967,0.000387096,0.0004423534,0.00006301193,0.0004338953,0.0001261233,0.000005383704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000399396,0.0001896374,0.00004272983,0.001620327,0.004430703,0.0005978498,0.0003122723,0.0002302779,4.998749e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004130969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005987886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001060675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979084,0.000005321493,0.0005276699,0.0004170708,0.0005425265,0.000599047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991997,0.00005197519,0.0001535089,0.0002584567,0.0001972184,0.0001391169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006090089,0.000264769,0.2579302,0.0008330077,0.0002418403,0.00000345799,0.007033853,0.00008651981,0.5539653,0.05048771,0.00005565691,0.1290368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002043566,0.001300041,0.007888015,0.0008253346,0.0001926032,0.00002956774,0.004088815,0.1523945,0.8281829,0.002070357,0.0002000365,0.0007842648],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981737,0.000565177,0.0001145185,0.0001237615,0.00006144887,0.0001680837,0.0000170272,0.00007538861,0.0007009225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930266,0.0003284885,0.006578434,0.000009335374,0.0000227547,0.000003603126,0.000002144367,0.00001086622,0.00001781832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2742177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01193873931418432,"score_gpt":0.2280220536008564,"score_spread":0.216083314286672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}