{"id":"W2252592691","doi":"10.3197/096327114x13947900181077","title":"Representing Global Public Concern: A Critical Analysis of the Danish Participatory Experiment on Climate Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Values","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Negotiation; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Political science; Publics; Convention; Global warming; Citizen journalism; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Danish; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Politics; Law; Ecology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006791556,0.00007377523,0.0001325895,0.00002970282,0.0003371876,0.00004448944,0.0002822049,0.00005071984,0.0008224217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001681371,0.00006134668,0.0001214,0.0002368489,0.0006179887,0.0001490041,0.0002329703,0.0000580676,0.00004860968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003249886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001296506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003766829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002966651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984114,0.0005277846,0.0001805283,0.0001660303,0.0004847029,0.000229605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993069,0.0000815908,0.00008273157,0.0003844687,0.00001083112,0.0001334422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002589605,0.0005553633,0.8841664,0.000005571128,0.0001135011,0.000001066676,0.08844204,0.00001614143,0.0007427538,0.02060813,0.0004389941,0.004884197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041327,0.0001042423,0.8302228,0.00003946952,0.0003689459,4.502459e-7,0.1475183,0.001214084,0.0006201684,0.0006919,0.0185308,0.0002755641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761787,0.0003336973,0.000003706548,0.002854166,0.0001922203,0.0001602788,0.00005786977,0.00002768226,0.02019167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998913,0.0004516959,0.00003119726,0.0003922289,0.00009879833,0.00004631834,0.00001857926,0.000004672034,0.00004345395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05907622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9004941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7567733988270012,"score_gpt":0.5130056919126393,"score_spread":0.2437677069143619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}