{"id":"W2252735622","doi":"10.1139/er-2015-0073","title":"Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Management science; Cumulative effects; Political science; Environmental impact statement; Process management; Psychology; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Economics; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04951754,0.002256341,0.003759296,0.007854495,0.003591435,0.01306827,0.006398929,0.007566699,0.006551792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09949028,0.00170382,0.002562813,0.007537172,0.04192891,0.02181336,0.008638235,0.01478171,0.001150699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009011401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007042626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006043428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9729653,0.01552737,0.00163516,0.003473299,0.005815264,0.0005836416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7537444,0.2288822,0.003496876,0.0068129,0.006113153,0.0009504247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001429356,0.000023375,0.0004621677,0.0005510279,0.00004335356,0.00005621561,0.0004391858,0.003601218,0.00003221192,0.9745795,0.001563763,0.01863369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006275356,0.00000638636,0.00009205919,0.0002432975,0.00000932483,0.00002733573,0.0001099458,0.002062104,0.00002445874,0.9930621,0.004345014,0.00001167892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009377819,0.1502535,0.6742373,0.09631789,0.002107668,0.0004548187,0.0007181403,0.0002755694,0.06625734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5284911,0.1136531,0.3225226,0.01553828,0.009846338,0.002606687,0.0005249485,0.00035076,0.006466137],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04951754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01505686755956529,"score_gpt":0.2846188158440571,"score_spread":0.2695619482844918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}