{"id":"W2252735622","doi":"10.1139/er-2015-0073","title":"Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Management science; Cumulative effects; Political science; Environmental impact statement; Process management; Psychology; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Economics; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005099779,0.000371677,0.000419771,0.00002633205,0.0002377273,0.00003740901,0.0002243262,0.0001152241,0.002473851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004441939,0.0002301274,0.000131328,0.00009436358,0.001394329,0.0003824767,0.0004801717,0.0001714226,0.001424238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004290024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001682147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004608954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977012,0.0003101962,0.000422115,0.0005984635,0.0004651229,0.0005028698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989716,0.0001855811,0.000189021,0.0003274588,1.874127e-7,0.0003261727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001397853,0.0004136041,0.3146102,0.00003218272,0.00004499143,0.00001545396,0.0005917642,0.000001576912,0.1212211,0.001617444,0.001161984,0.5602757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001735007,0.0005219478,0.7852631,0.0002980493,0.000103693,0.00002613541,0.00008925145,0.00006612376,0.002569512,0.01737389,0.1910455,0.0009078762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581467,0.001507312,0.004323033,0.001129393,0.0002656197,0.001905677,0.00002064021,0.00007532731,0.03262629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892588,0.00651183,0.001279139,0.0007733178,0.0000664671,0.0001339903,0.000009322926,0.00004117752,0.001925988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01505686755956529,"score_gpt":0.2846188158440571,"score_spread":0.2695619482844918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}