{"id":"W2252837947","doi":"10.5849/forsci.13-183","title":"Forest Carbon Offsets Revisited: Shedding Light on Darkwoods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon offset; Climate change; Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Offset (computer science); Carbon accounting; Carbon credit; Greenhouse gas; Forest inventory; Carbon sink; Global warming; Forest management; Business; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006152502,0.000649286,0.0008995099,0.001364855,0.003239417,0.006833304,0.001919246,0.006233144,0.0136299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184022,0.0002446533,0.0004319081,0.001797133,0.01634646,0.01081926,0.004962387,0.01230966,0.0007125071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003328307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004822331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01345264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02876241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980206,0.0005123718,0.00005091496,0.000316929,0.0006309398,0.0004681982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923211,0.004716769,0.0004485053,0.0005090664,0.0009667042,0.001037917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007897719,0.00003079336,0.0008718713,0.000110294,0.0000202014,0.0001084544,0.0006509619,0.0008059113,0.0002648564,0.9073212,0.03214265,0.05759377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000226436,0.00001709391,0.001563811,0.0003356151,0.00002028029,0.00006130569,0.001569532,0.0005858744,0.0002509253,0.860956,0.134595,0.00002206218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0547256,0.04170468,0.009911061,0.7189173,0.006811529,0.00001866616,0.0002847549,0.00009508532,0.1675314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8063364,0.02120736,0.003163611,0.1329258,0.007392491,0.00004252178,0.0001242205,0.0002299824,0.02857761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04559648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006711380768219396,"score_gpt":0.2371906859681506,"score_spread":0.2304793051999312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}