{"id":"W2252837947","doi":"10.5849/forsci.13-183","title":"Forest Carbon Offsets Revisited: Shedding Light on Darkwoods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon offset; Climate change; Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Offset (computer science); Carbon accounting; Carbon credit; Greenhouse gas; Forest inventory; Carbon sink; Global warming; Forest management; Business; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016911,0.0002072357,0.0001588889,0.0001828618,0.0004345841,0.0001559607,0.001025511,0.00005105176,0.0006517455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002474383,0.000170662,0.00005706721,0.00116792,0.0006392024,0.0004533375,0.0004900233,0.0001451024,0.002982059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001717426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001567066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004671813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002845394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975989,0.00003890298,0.0002221573,0.0006178453,0.0008482272,0.0006739068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989067,0.00005437404,0.0001027201,0.0006852236,0.00001104212,0.0002399206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003809224,0.0001533914,0.624814,0.00003040117,0.00000735201,0.00001436486,0.0006047665,0.04112151,0.004230635,0.2805481,0.0404885,0.007948889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005779057,0.0006773198,0.3521094,0.0001594538,0.00002884056,0.00001121319,0.00001900015,0.2850958,0.001212302,0.01799897,0.3411455,0.0009643483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6396657,0.000006007384,0.0001015801,0.0006733232,0.00025071,0.0001843565,0.000001114748,0.0000807403,0.3590365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948122,0.000006045338,0.0003511052,0.0007529776,0.0001688191,0.00001392792,0.00000384932,0.00001691391,0.003874177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3551623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006711380768219396,"score_gpt":0.2371906859681506,"score_spread":0.2304793051999312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}