{"id":"W2254350624","doi":"10.1007/s12080-015-0283-7","title":"The “edge effect” phenomenon: deriving population abundance patterns from individual animal movement decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Ecology","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Movement (music); Link (geometry); Econometrics; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654731,0.0001266428,0.0001632572,0.000006359464,0.0003579016,0.00006664969,0.000263034,0.0001174504,0.0004943139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003049461,0.00004103288,0.00005767719,0.00009114003,0.0002540159,0.00006247893,0.0001719928,0.0001586844,0.00008456156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005572614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006210759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001464733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003373413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986619,0.0002675516,0.0002188707,0.0003266328,0.0002147456,0.0003102795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988312,0.000831378,0.00006642337,0.00008765268,0.0000461343,0.0001372442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005483724,0.0002342296,0.613232,0.00000162454,0.00003785589,0.00001093078,0.0003219872,0.000009497177,0.04439205,0.1677768,0.0003379468,0.1730968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001629766,0.001088429,0.9474151,0.000005260774,0.00002877313,0.000003324108,0.0002005405,0.0000532855,0.0008766953,0.04967833,0.0003744253,0.0001129044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970606,0.00007534544,0.00002982841,0.001742078,0.0004034601,0.0002282657,0.00002975155,0.0000558786,0.0003748177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991092,0.00001498692,0.00003836443,0.0001920854,0.0004931382,0.00003203616,0.0000898844,0.000001554598,0.00002873714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3341831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02416846771899977,"score_gpt":0.251922609021475,"score_spread":0.2277541413024752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}