{"id":"W2254550589","doi":"10.1016/j.jfa.2016.09.008","title":"An eigensystem approach to Anderson localization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Functional Analysis","topic":"Quantum many-body systems","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Eigenfunction; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Mathematics; Anderson impurity model; Operator (biology); Anderson localization; Finite volume method; Spectrum (functional analysis); Mathematical analysis; Scale (ratio); Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154833,0.0007175161,0.001377536,0.001799022,0.001570354,0.002340394,0.001918987,0.001785476,0.007772648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002317904,0.0005108957,0.001173969,0.001219484,0.002889223,0.004091611,0.002207178,0.002183251,0.0008119352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009709857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00121604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001599019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002099674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994447,0.0002929398,0.00002819681,0.00004686201,0.0001319053,0.00005539215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992587,0.000305394,0.00004519285,0.0001189116,0.0001515793,0.0001203133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002148503,0.000008901885,0.00002431366,0.000006904904,0.000003814901,0.00001197731,0.00002116575,0.001309065,0.0001113046,0.9976009,0.0003297334,0.000569747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003827494,0.000004205676,0.00003540337,0.000004265706,0.000002308434,0.00001312602,0.00001402181,0.02826253,0.00002875308,0.9711,0.0005263125,0.000005313366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08168279,0.002908541,0.7910701,0.01030136,0.001678791,0.00008451758,0.0002119849,0.0003165661,0.1117453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8042857,0.00310273,0.1272798,0.002313307,0.002645899,0.0002848233,0.0002112279,0.0004124283,0.05946415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007772648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02600211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01552966866297695,"score_gpt":0.2346702786095312,"score_spread":0.2191406099465543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}