{"id":"W2254623187","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-11","title":"Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation: A Logical Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Statutory law; Computer science; Political science; Management science; Law; Philosophy; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004994278,0.001094589,0.0006620457,0.003087148,0.00237393,0.006670884,0.00219412,0.00311675,0.008095158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00680139,0.0006618094,0.00122565,0.003681908,0.009711278,0.01245506,0.002736085,0.005639748,0.002132057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004477978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001487602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001110759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007513296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968801,0.001669277,0.0001794187,0.0002027471,0.0009499303,0.0001184617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967063,0.002358484,0.0001817717,0.0003158187,0.0003426287,0.00009499377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001373106,0.000002363148,0.000005359804,0.00002038287,0.00000109338,0.00001143981,0.0001838073,0.0002898949,0.00003213785,0.9960474,0.0007775925,0.002627145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003759336,0.000003808554,0.0000153698,0.00007823627,0.000002379045,0.00003141772,0.00006215296,0.001900692,0.00007233609,0.9684821,0.02934361,0.000004179513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005105282,0.0161709,0.62699,0.01048049,0.0009524202,0.0001986433,0.0002087211,0.0002071275,0.3396865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3999781,0.01906654,0.4725529,0.002564075,0.001999533,0.001166189,0.0006487364,0.0004409085,0.1015831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008095158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03249013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04442751660767644,"score_gpt":0.2963182394886462,"score_spread":0.2518907228809697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}