{"id":"W2255313489","doi":"10.1684/epd.2015.0782","title":"Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy for refractory focal epilepsy in paediatric patients: a retrospective single‐centre study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epileptic Disorders","topic":"Epilepsy research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Lacosamide; Medicine; Tolerability; Retrospective cohort study; Epilepsy; Concomitant; Adjunctive treatment; Refractory (planetary science); Antiepileptic drug; Adverse effect; Pediatrics; Medical record; Internal medicine; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055144,0.000281962,0.000872844,0.0008701543,0.0003826507,0.0006689649,0.0003772518,0.0003359221,0.001099429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004586495,0.0002644924,0.000772236,0.001299035,0.000489933,0.0004685596,0.0003542519,0.0004151456,0.0002461648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005989113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006927024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002044586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001884977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984059,0.0004203034,0.00033713,0.0003000954,0.0004192064,0.0001173433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940679,0.0009042423,0.004035868,0.000194053,0.0005212207,0.0002767967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003355088,0.00004493127,0.9958644,0.00008454933,0.00009575835,0.0005211147,0.00008981067,0.00003253813,0.0003264939,0.000009111242,0.00005687678,0.002538862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006534447,0.002070864,0.9911709,0.0000471393,0.0001599544,0.005206323,0.000281096,0.00008590598,0.0002800835,0.000006380414,0.0006155992,0.0000103888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974886,0.001817984,0.00008573773,0.00001705189,0.000005155766,0.00003363637,0.0002383871,0.000003115426,0.000310318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983894,0.000911354,0.0001637538,0.00003889814,0.00002068163,0.00002916277,0.0003867702,0.000003365761,0.00005667466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002044586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005580246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02034824166759587,"score_gpt":0.2997487470985227,"score_spread":0.2794005054309269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}