{"id":"W2255313489","doi":"10.1684/epd.2015.0782","title":"Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy for refractory focal epilepsy in paediatric patients: a retrospective single‐centre study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epileptic Disorders","topic":"Epilepsy research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Lacosamide; Medicine; Tolerability; Retrospective cohort study; Epilepsy; Concomitant; Adjunctive treatment; Refractory (planetary science); Antiepileptic drug; Adverse effect; Pediatrics; Medical record; Internal medicine; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005427863,0.0002751213,0.0005914205,0.0002129794,0.00005870761,0.00001546228,0.0001056643,0.0001052581,0.00004320002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001145446,0.0002215424,0.00009905503,0.0003689579,0.0001733544,0.0001839728,0.0000536067,0.0002589643,0.000009764975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004029483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002511012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000384931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009143997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976851,0.0002540273,0.000453662,0.0005689613,0.0005327433,0.0005055151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984,0.0003685523,0.0001498112,0.0003751828,0.0003109996,0.0003954918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01411857,0.01631674,0.9154618,0.00002684368,0.0002311431,0.00001094159,0.005317065,0.000006260152,0.00001532915,0.0001094265,0.0001975417,0.04818838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04790323,0.03135414,0.9110618,0.00005094556,0.00009755798,8.421627e-7,0.007472596,0.00005537753,0.0000183369,0.001350034,0.0004404314,0.000194762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993037,0.0006207818,0.00003504777,0.0003051253,0.000106923,0.004464754,0.00004965047,0.0000377854,0.001342873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988829,0.0003035716,0.000222216,0.00007640626,0.00006801837,0.0001572746,0.0001443686,0.00004529437,0.00009993408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04799362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02034824166759587,"score_gpt":0.2997487470985227,"score_spread":0.2794005054309269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}