{"id":"W2255497351","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.018","title":"Flood inundation uncertainty: The case of a 0.5% annual probability flood event","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Sight Research UK; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Natural Environment Research Council; Crown Estate","keywords":"Flood myth; Environmental science; Event (particle physics); Return period; Range (aeronautics); Forcing (mathematics); Marsh; Climate change; Coastal flood; Environmental resource management; Climatology; Geography; Sea level rise; Ecology; Wetland; Oceanography; Geology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004021078,0.0004712747,0.0007663406,0.00105677,0.001067657,0.002347917,0.0009512895,0.002771199,0.002626652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02238797,0.0003958002,0.0007205479,0.001280433,0.001536404,0.001856209,0.001592926,0.001726432,0.0001701615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002018882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000600599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02665945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02286199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985397,0.0005590218,0.00008719148,0.0001704279,0.0002233354,0.0004204401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784958,0.01746109,0.002129432,0.0004802253,0.0006943051,0.0007392136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006448245,0.0001620602,0.0867113,0.0001232458,0.0001668085,0.009937959,0.0009442667,0.8503348,0.0008314938,0.03566134,0.00387533,0.01060657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000569861,0.0002502207,0.06988616,0.00007236065,0.0001353467,0.002502337,0.002860033,0.8734125,0.0006808369,0.04810374,0.001868476,0.000170924],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719723,0.0003920052,0.009501729,0.003824434,0.00004440033,0.00003929883,0.0009359964,0.00007561198,0.01321421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987532,0.00007012724,0.0006136083,0.00004657718,0.00001343976,0.000005743979,0.00007892111,0.000006463404,0.000411859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02665945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05300856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005994740678403387,"score_gpt":0.252075263295927,"score_spread":0.2460805226175236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}