{"id":"W2255497351","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.018","title":"Flood inundation uncertainty: The case of a 0.5% annual probability flood event","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Sight Research UK; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Natural Environment Research Council; Crown Estate","keywords":"Flood myth; Environmental science; Event (particle physics); Return period; Range (aeronautics); Forcing (mathematics); Marsh; Climate change; Coastal flood; Environmental resource management; Climatology; Geography; Sea level rise; Ecology; Wetland; Oceanography; Geology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001183703,0.000212425,0.0001563774,0.00008791633,0.0004894694,0.00003563832,0.0007322258,0.00004305407,0.00151818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009059022,0.000117586,0.00009119191,0.0006167152,0.002753556,0.0008080886,0.001034111,0.00008682619,0.0003737521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001051037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006635212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003681314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007933588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976435,0.0001100722,0.000367903,0.0005984201,0.0007061464,0.0005740146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988802,0.00006347055,0.0001893989,0.0006767913,0.000004399491,0.0001857516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009174536,0.002025841,0.102236,0.00002377039,0.00005915523,0.0001119261,0.00673256,0.005252145,0.266125,0.01669891,0.001819646,0.5988234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003288821,0.00131262,0.8607854,0.00006951202,0.0001485226,0.0004165852,0.006064565,0.002848021,0.05700719,0.02383955,0.0428369,0.00138229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918892,0.00001244625,0.0004693869,0.002696424,0.00009565773,0.0006612699,0.00005950222,0.00002920149,0.004086903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984387,0.0000408625,0.0004973475,0.0002053516,0.00006481878,0.00006239089,0.000002729702,0.00001137857,0.0006764142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7585495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005994740678403387,"score_gpt":0.252075263295927,"score_spread":0.2460805226175236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}