{"id":"W2255512638","doi":"10.1007/s002270000517","title":"Cross-correlation bias in lag analysis of aquatic time series","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Biology","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Autocorrelation; Lag; Statistics; Multiplicity (mathematics); Sample size determination; Monte Carlo method; Cross-correlation; Series (stratigraphy); Correlation; Time series; A priori and a posteriori; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics; Computer science; Biology; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002645814,0.00006449528,0.0001858467,0.0001375165,0.00002347151,0.000008135194,0.0001360209,0.000068602,0.05042693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001224409,0.00005504792,0.0000471552,0.0009949073,0.0002231582,0.00009263297,0.000338773,0.00007241787,0.0002276528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004426122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005026599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007050018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004165877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992894,0.0000689416,0.0002097641,0.0001727647,0.00008106491,0.0001780502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996646,0.00007063013,0.00005159792,0.0001791842,0.000005331294,0.00002867962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004806553,0.00003316762,0.9690464,0.000001375975,0.00002819618,0.00000408183,0.00003623974,0.0002549738,0.0004395368,0.00007487276,0.00003419218,0.02999887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001303347,0.00008947248,0.9633036,3.076659e-7,0.0000167278,0.000001686425,0.000006430183,0.01395109,0.0000338007,0.0004320173,0.02197546,0.00005903919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7840037,0.000001396118,0.00007260114,0.0001067374,0.00001657803,0.0000545404,0.000001839169,0.000007845713,0.2157347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776193,0.00003327166,0.0002280647,0.00003897847,0.00001112346,0.00000826911,0.000101509,0.000004158619,0.02195528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1937795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02180825885284979,"score_gpt":0.2887402130518945,"score_spread":0.2669319541990447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}