{"id":"W2255760530","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.134555","title":"Strategic Response to Evolving Food Safety Standards: A Case Study of Guyana’s Fish Export Sector","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œEstey Centre journal of international law and trade policy","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Food safety; Fish <Actinopterygii>; International market; Export performance; Industrial organization; International trade; Market access; Compliance (psychology); Developing country; International economics; Economics; Fishery; Economic growth; Food science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001466683,0.0004911373,0.0002421368,0.001172079,0.007106549,0.002297946,0.001454357,0.004079296,0.003509622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002633347,0.0003340482,0.0003351954,0.001819139,0.003627036,0.00129058,0.003139277,0.001674908,0.0004385187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004919004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002116713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08731335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1907815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998735,0.0006906465,0.00003323737,0.00006396196,0.00008613607,0.000391074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965348,0.002211175,0.0004273852,0.0001604384,0.0002853877,0.0003807215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009826955,0.002666841,0.225273,0.0006805083,0.0001089722,0.171386,0.520544,0.007742329,0.01236759,0.01727575,0.005571824,0.03540045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332449,0.001033428,0.1189654,0.0002223169,0.00004978347,0.005722612,0.848612,0.005156642,0.00256191,0.001434362,0.0160112,0.00009715196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951444,0.00005399407,0.0001806936,0.0006198131,0.000003019577,0.00002983159,0.00002457033,0.000004341395,0.003939325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974627,0.0001394964,0.0003506912,0.0001938866,0.000002933906,0.00001928822,0.00003150945,0.000003907369,0.001795446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08731335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1736103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02764386159199392,"score_gpt":0.2942349687008394,"score_spread":0.2665911071088455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}