{"id":"W2255858454","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.005","title":"How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment International","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Credibility; Risk assessment; Grading (engineering); Environmental health; Observational study; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Exposure assessment; Agency (philosophy); Internal validity; Public health; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160052,0.0002069696,0.0005045308,0.000212007,0.0001821832,0.0002078798,0.0004318198,0.00005909434,0.0002462348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001303333,0.000171557,0.00009055425,0.00005549845,0.00008373788,0.0005021081,0.000206937,0.0001450946,0.0001302124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009931107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005069689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005996486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001153533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961618,0.0004859027,0.002027931,0.000636281,0.0004067813,0.0002813073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962984,0.0009745423,0.002081817,0.000474685,0.0000156837,0.0001548639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003379915,0.001387786,0.9570946,0.0001248891,0.0004208009,0.000004107834,0.004351228,0.0008425777,0.000591068,0.003137773,0.006558018,0.02514913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005032605,0.001310714,0.9259133,0.0005024975,0.0000159158,0.000005952141,0.004078339,0.004969007,0.0001720158,0.001546107,0.05594161,0.0005118735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970965,0.0003799312,0.02436703,0.07146215,0.0006538301,0.001870968,0.003826026,0.00001987083,0.0003236602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919406,0.00008394637,0.003504394,0.002768284,0.0002693193,0.0003041988,0.00006469616,0.00002390051,0.001040693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09484403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6995891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3790899069598085,"score_gpt":0.445247100886897,"score_spread":0.06615719392708841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}