{"id":"W2256341401","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008754","title":"Coming in from the Shadow of the Law: The Use of Law by States to Negotiate International Environmental Disputes in Good Faith","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legitimacy; Negotiation; Political science; Duty; Context (archaeology); Soft law; Environmental law; Law and economics; Dispute resolution; Shadow (psychology); Obligation; International law; Sociology; Politics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003566898,0.0002360629,0.0002394891,0.0001289603,0.00009545869,0.00008677715,0.002199612,0.0001029663,0.001505269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001165321,0.0001912818,0.0001426337,0.0001511128,0.0008093898,0.0004491537,0.0003684267,0.00030174,0.00002572698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002555406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9192442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9577436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973755,0.0001122758,0.0007750373,0.0003930211,0.0009499154,0.0003941895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.000397526,0.0003337756,0.0003670028,0.00007974957,0.0001458891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000833318,0.0001351236,0.2685199,0.000003312342,0.0001356939,0.00002911127,0.001138557,0.0136046,0.001580174,0.7090869,0.005453262,0.0002300391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001743071,0.00007769027,0.5772631,0.0004439891,0.00003687712,0.00003971338,0.0005826743,0.01318289,0.007970269,0.03715004,0.3609076,0.0006021306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743372,0.00005196653,0.00004260022,0.01040213,0.0008258689,0.0005223039,0.005539329,0.000009312352,0.1082693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937491,0.00001194586,0.0003669854,0.003327837,0.0001229969,0.00004513523,0.0003568531,0.00003121502,0.00198797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6719368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004636709709903357,"score_gpt":0.1804914046563248,"score_spread":0.1758546949464215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}