{"id":"W2257981024","doi":"","title":"Smith and the Supreme Court: Implications for Sentencing Policy and Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Law; Sentencing guidelines; Reform Act; Charter; Vision; Sentence; Commission; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001771071,0.00005826014,0.00009064811,0.00003695016,0.002037485,0.00005677819,0.0001391197,0.00003147024,0.000001819971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002648272,0.00003770471,0.0000425853,0.00009961877,0.0004166414,0.0001873245,0.00002095367,0.0003437771,0.000001004211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005723015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007146501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01615029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.00005676364,0.0001211545,0.00009334951,0.0001150953,0.000906285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.0001694193,0.00006935208,0.00006852248,0.00009094376,0.0000777246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003893831,0.000005603524,0.001360812,0.00000245938,0.0000176581,1.999609e-7,0.003273345,4.180341e-7,0.00002783248,0.9869106,0.0001343724,0.008227793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00118688,0.0001557166,0.01002755,0.00002479768,0.00006201569,0.001248306,0.03506492,0.0000443369,0.00001097434,0.9047635,0.04725336,0.0001576171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7156306,0.01038404,0.00545075,0.2588215,0.00009189039,0.0004928262,0.000005183502,0.00003619902,0.009087044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703073,0.02749637,0.00007210259,0.0002137031,0.000474793,0.0000089265,2.642803e-7,0.000005290396,0.001421241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2586078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03130250775665623,"score_gpt":0.3259870783984141,"score_spread":0.2946845706417579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}