{"id":"W2257981024","doi":"","title":"Smith and the Supreme Court: Implications for Sentencing Policy and Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Law; Sentencing guidelines; Reform Act; Charter; Vision; Sentence; Commission; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02109131,0.0004566157,0.0009417506,0.002742201,0.0145871,0.01845034,0.004248533,0.02001123,0.007214685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05379427,0.0007629422,0.001170991,0.002928873,0.02565661,0.0110659,0.004575158,0.01236275,0.0005246781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07864548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5479138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5228454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9716675,0.009993661,0.001034094,0.002608846,0.007543223,0.00715258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984198,0.008820391,0.001000214,0.000542015,0.003650622,0.0017888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001242353,0.0000203423,0.0002303386,0.00004208826,0.000007916743,0.00007784947,0.001050713,0.0008307421,0.0000645364,0.9734992,0.01497815,0.00918574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001257789,0.0001427743,0.004307742,0.0007226593,0.0001054154,0.0001426436,0.005979945,0.004649859,0.0006279421,0.7274597,0.2555601,0.0001754413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02502265,0.01612844,0.003499025,0.8173131,0.001684986,0.0001143862,0.00008934901,0.0001143075,0.1360337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7737083,0.01320671,0.005539366,0.1470026,0.002947141,0.0001964226,0.00007799081,0.00004964801,0.05727182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5479138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03130250775665623,"score_gpt":0.3259870783984141,"score_spread":0.2946845706417579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}