{"id":"W2259177049","doi":"10.1177/1527002515587260","title":"The Louis–Schmelling Paradox and the League Standing Effect Reconsidered","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sports Economics","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"League; Economics; Competitor analysis; Preference; Order (exchange); Sports economics; Consumer choice; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Revenue; Consumer demand; Loss aversion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005748039,0.0001563718,0.0005883949,0.0001240787,0.000237819,0.0003113724,0.0002440469,0.00007102248,0.00003855863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001536996,0.00009844696,0.0001857605,0.00007652483,0.0001946847,0.0002505729,0.00004430435,0.0002991686,0.00001579124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006489852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003460559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001196167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983088,0.00001441029,0.001217811,0.000167464,0.00004557205,0.000245953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976122,0.000266809,0.001626605,0.0002748081,0.00006585306,0.0001537121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001087584,0.00003462587,0.6346417,0.00003179169,0.000406676,0.00005572903,0.001813966,0.01726527,5.956445e-7,0.3244979,0.004185085,0.01597905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01078929,0.0005512972,0.03198432,0.0001716138,0.0001611991,0.001014395,0.001856503,0.09258975,0.00009493758,0.3802785,0.4795842,0.0009239615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791462,0.01141132,0.0003432365,0.001575416,0.001575141,0.0001478371,0.000008217436,0.000005419692,0.00578718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871444,0.01166628,0.0001205563,0.0001878349,0.0004294611,0.000002062867,8.47381e-7,0.00002055656,0.0004280494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6026574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.401455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03440536533258526,"score_gpt":0.2156863179598155,"score_spread":0.1812809526272302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}