{"id":"W2260539408","doi":"10.21314/jcr.2005.026","title":"Practical and theoretical challenges in validating Basel parameters: key learnings from the experience of a Canadian bank","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Credit Risk","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Basel II; Loss given default; Probability of default; Capital requirement; Rating system; Actuarial science; Basel III; Capital adequacy ratio; Econometrics; Credit rating; Test (biology); Key (lock); Point (geometry); Economics; Risk-adjusted return on capital; Calibration; Operational risk; Credit risk; Computer science; Risk management; Statistics; Finance; Mathematics; Human capital; Financial capital; Microeconomics; Environmental economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995517,0.00009025881,0.0002706678,0.0002003899,0.0001263201,0.0000368901,0.0002308976,0.00007138423,0.0001349884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002412837,0.00006099629,0.00006671609,0.0001950337,0.0003238969,0.0002346372,0.00003535116,0.0004436388,0.000008668831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004865053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008851866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02181971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.0001071701,0.0006199133,0.0001116973,0.00007674009,0.0001922845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976901,0.001337912,0.0006262481,0.0001985379,0.00004686137,0.0001003799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001864022,0.0001150192,0.2533873,0.00000699245,0.00008025178,0.00001267031,0.06224968,0.001283368,0.00002335418,0.6467914,0.001857523,0.03400606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008978702,0.0002580974,0.8288852,0.000103876,0.0000642278,0.00007980552,0.012375,0.01044205,0.0001771245,0.07880152,0.0676701,0.0002451637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811996,0.003792336,0.001024881,0.01247111,0.0001480459,0.00007306522,0.0000521944,0.000002254383,0.001236535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870881,0.008697091,0.003774276,0.00003645731,0.000383894,0.00000200228,6.947901e-7,0.000008934326,0.000008522525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5754979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06714477114132276,"score_gpt":0.2641478841963451,"score_spread":0.1970031130550223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}