{"id":"W2260898312","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_46","title":"A Comparison of Different Integral-Equation-Based Approaches for Local Gravity Field Modelling: Case Study for the Canadian Rocky Mountains","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International Association of Geodesy symposia","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretization; Field (mathematics); Gravitational field; Poisson distribution; Integral equation; Mathematics; Geodesy; Geology; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Applied mathematics; Physics; Classical mechanics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005224726,0.0002369771,0.0004783778,0.0001827076,0.0002016587,0.00004090645,0.0003573184,0.0002603228,0.0001508121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001830453,0.000171045,0.000325465,0.0000486105,0.00004580407,0.00005244062,0.0000103178,0.0002650274,0.000004100557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001418356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002008879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1549251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3557975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983066,0.00006110146,0.0006116057,0.0002875028,0.0005069627,0.0002262277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954782,0.002980856,0.000736815,0.0001579525,0.0005416272,0.0001045257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001034598,0.001088004,0.1934681,0.0002230302,0.002948403,0.00001233973,0.002624674,0.3624227,0.000002974824,0.1575312,0.001116446,0.2775275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006360093,0.001039912,0.004792577,0.0000353692,0.0003089621,0.000001848388,0.0001840086,0.9425104,0.00009631237,0.04664678,0.003490467,0.0002573261],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03709856,0.0003303061,0.9242548,0.003966514,0.001738617,0.005598371,0.003707479,0.00004988942,0.02325548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898662,0.000003803888,0.0007808095,0.00008413488,0.0001344163,0.00003911024,0.000459822,0.000009427362,0.008622303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1050136124220851,"score_gpt":0.2967808216027275,"score_spread":0.1917672091806424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}