{"id":"W2260998728","doi":"","title":"A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003-2004 Constitutional Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Parliament; Legitimacy; Constitution; Law of the case; Politics; High Court; Court of record; Margin of appreciation; Deference; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Fundamental rights; Human rights","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157352,0.000270756,0.0006760735,0.0160049,0.003966874,0.00823817,0.002081839,0.002744001,0.002584254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04842071,0.0006155575,0.0007577704,0.02349551,0.006757754,0.003343997,0.001485142,0.002688764,0.0005076269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03304093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0423742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3466863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6612154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885578,0.002265006,0.001446057,0.000988332,0.005381509,0.00136126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406085,0.03842966,0.005263815,0.001343617,0.01346982,0.0008846151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002376796,0.0001776404,0.02720644,0.01194873,0.0002483835,0.004705725,0.02604075,0.001513874,0.002820319,0.287477,0.2820158,0.3556076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412694,0.00005859441,0.0686402,0.008100802,0.0001880856,0.000910475,0.01058867,0.0002400289,0.0008614163,0.006476554,0.9038383,0.00007291315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06824103,0.6943338,0.001303093,0.08112367,0.002908176,0.0002602178,0.001777088,0.00006093231,0.149992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4563434,0.4793129,0.002273062,0.03624639,0.002791258,0.0001940129,0.001410652,0.0001188945,0.02130936],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3466863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02006274118104415,"score_gpt":0.3097946944180742,"score_spread":0.28973195323703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}