{"id":"W226124108","doi":"","title":"Considérations sur le « faux » en littérature. Yzabelle Martineau, Le faux littéraire. Plagiat littéraire, intertextualité et dialogisme, Québec, Nota bene, coll. « Essais critiques », 2002, 286 p., 24,95 $.Yzabelle Martineau, Le faux littéraire. Plagiat littéraire, intertextualité et dialogisme, Québec, Nota bene, coll. « Essais critiques », 2002, 286 p., 24,95 $.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lettres québécoises : La revue de l’actualité littéraire","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004510884,0.001007035,0.0008953652,0.003883211,0.01446507,0.01016296,0.003050083,0.006271667,0.02255637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009717292,0.0005784436,0.0005436981,0.006117473,0.01077216,0.007714572,0.002752099,0.006699163,0.003845699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06015927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05181995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8917046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9458409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964901,0.000889994,0.0001248889,0.0003348339,0.001658344,0.0005019756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930032,0.001712823,0.0002845808,0.0002083152,0.004301377,0.0004897068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001649398,0.00001365186,0.0004361369,0.0003921749,0.000007047733,0.0001404685,0.007519543,0.00007089275,0.0001072425,0.0801307,0.8834922,0.02767348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000253216,0.000002408086,0.0008323652,0.0006153761,0.000003900224,0.00007971947,0.003074837,0.00002395689,0.00004819389,0.003127226,0.992178,0.00001148163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001394609,0.6249905,0.001219828,0.2803441,0.01320828,0.00003529886,0.0003489462,0.00008747573,0.078371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07442571,0.3757299,0.002359213,0.126229,0.009548895,0.0001848654,0.0005758748,0.0004266732,0.4105199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4364881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06573917152269525,"score_gpt":0.2741927833158234,"score_spread":0.2084536117931281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}