{"id":"W2262251735","doi":"10.1002/ijc.29996","title":"Assessment of mediators of racial disparities in cervical cancer survival in the <scp>U</scp>nited <scp>S</scp>tates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cancer","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Cancer Research Society","keywords":"Medicine; Demography; Socioeconomic status; Hazard ratio; Epidemiology; Proportional hazards model; Marital status; Confidence interval; Cervical cancer; Cancer registry; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; Gerontology; Cancer; Population; Internal medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008561555,0.0001577787,0.0004987029,0.0003835698,0.00001706497,0.00002058818,0.0005143668,0.00009644305,0.0001115707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009657207,0.00009370584,0.0001792706,0.0002978038,0.0001721912,0.0002838867,0.00006274584,0.0003458227,9.768439e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004670394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007691435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002809482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00420344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968771,0.0001290288,0.0009421995,0.000148984,0.001646793,0.0002559383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968721,0.001302299,0.0006935606,0.0001181972,0.0009189974,0.00009482114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099985,0.0001428514,0.9886832,0.00004030623,0.0002583618,0.0001099172,0.001249604,0.0002848077,0.003402387,0.001007647,0.001563903,0.003157021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003084482,0.000184921,0.9848821,0.001405451,0.00008106352,0.00003436652,0.001821584,0.0001124633,0.003280311,0.0006864856,0.004397577,0.00002923631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917183,0.002752489,0.0001956136,0.002429189,0.001234277,0.0001293654,0.0001031038,0.000003776048,0.001433918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962333,0.002128753,0.0001294695,0.0005546726,0.0008002119,0.00002301654,0.000003961379,0.00001324442,0.0001133943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004515009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4247115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04795864207839118,"score_gpt":0.3954590536672765,"score_spread":0.3475004115888853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}